Agile Project Management – Extending PMBOK

This content is syndicated from by Kelly Waters. To view the original post in full, click here.

I have long held the belief that agile is only a part and a subset of the wider topic of project management.  I feel there are various aspects of project management that aren't particularly covered by any of the most popular agile methods, or at least not by Scrum and XP (Extreme Programming).

Therefore I have always been keen to highlight the importance of project management beyond what is provided for by agile methods, and equally keen to help project managers understand where agile methods fit in to what they already know.

In the PMI's PMBOK (Project Management Body of Knowledge), agile is not specifically mentioned, however PMBOK tends to describe what a project manager should be managing, and not much about how to manage it.  Arguably, agile methods tend to focus a little more on how.

Although agile and traditional project management methods place a completely different emphasis on different parts of the project lifecycle (eg waterfall/PRINCE2 puts a heavy emphasis on the planning phase, whereas agile does not), it is somewhat possible to augment PMBOK with agile methods, as they are largely complimentary.

I hope that one day this will actually happen as an official and global standard, but in the meantime I thought I'd have a go at expanding on PMBOK, and in the style of PMBOK, to give my view about where agile fits in with the wider discipline of project management as a whole.

PMBOK highlights 5 distinct phases that are typical in many projects:


  • Initiating

  • Planning

  • Executing

  • Monitoring and Controlling

  • Closing


I think the same phases can be and usually are applied to agile projects, but as I mentioned earlier, the emphasis and detail within the phases would change accordingly, and some of the language would also change too.

Because of the iterative nature of agile methods, all of these phases take place firstly at the project level, initially only at a high level, and then again in more detail within each iteration or ‘Sprint’ (Sprint is the name given to an iteration in the Scrum agile methodology).

In PMBOK, under the Executing phase of a project, there is one particular process labelled 3.5.1 'Direct and Manage Project Execution'.  PMBOK says this is the process of performing the work defined in the plan, but leaves more or less everything else to the project manager's imagination.

Of course there are sections in PMBOK about managing scope, managing resources, managing finances, managing the schedule, etc, but PMBOK tends to cover what should be done and doesn't usually explain how.

So the first extension to PMBOK that I would write for agile project management would be to drill down on 3.5.1 ‘Direct and Manage Project Execution’ to cover managing iterations within an agile project.  I have done that below, in the same style and using similar language to PMBOK, and also retaining the PMBOK numbering system.

Here it is...

3.5.1    Direct and Manage Project Execution


Direct and Manage Project Execution is the process of delivering the features defined in the ‘Product Backlog’.  In agile projects, the work is performed in short, fixed-length iterations.  Each iteration has 4 key processes, reflecting 4 of the phases of a typical project:

  • Plan Iteration (Sprint Planning)

  • Execute Iteration (Sprint)

  • Monitor & Control Iteration (Manage Sprint)

  • Close Iteration (Sprint Review)


3.5.1.1    Plan Iteration (Sprint Planning)

Plan Iteration (Sprint Planning) is the process of discussing what can be delivered in the next iteration, clarifying requirements for selected User Stories’, identifying tasks and estimating the effort, and committing to the work.














Inputs



Tools & Techniques



Outputs


.1   Product Backlog (Prioritised)

.2   Velocity Achieved Previously

.3   User Stories (Draft)

.4   Team Members’ Availability

 
.1  Sprint Planning Meeting

.2  Estimating in Points (Fibonacci)

.3  Planning Poker
.1   Sprint Goals

.2   Sprint Backlog

.3   User Stories Selected

.4   Task Breakdown and Estimates

.5   Team’s Commitment

.6   Cards on Whiteboard

 

3.5.1.2    Execute Iteration (Sprint)

Execute Iteration (Sprint) is the process of producing working software as planned for the current iteration.














Inputs



Tools & Techniques



Outputs


.1   Selected User Stories (represented by
Cards on Whiteboard).2   Task Breakdown
.1  Collaboration

.2  Test Driven Development

.3  Automated Testing

.4  Continuous Integration or Daily Build

.5  Test Early & Often

.6  Pair Programming

.7  Refactoring

 
.1   Working Software for Selected User Stories

.2   Test Confirmations

.3   Automated Tests

.4   Any Related Documentation

3.5.1.3    Monitor and Control Iteration (Manage Sprint)

Monitor and Control Iteration (Manage Sprint) is the process of tracking work in progress and assisting successful delivery.














Inputs



Tools & Techniques



Outputs


.1   Work Completed Yesterday

.2   Work Planned Today

.3   Impediments Affecting Progress

.4   Working Software for User Stories Completed So Far
.1  Cards on Whiteboard

.2  Daily Scrum/Standup

.3  Daily Burndown or Burnup Chart

.4  Review Product Frequently / Active User Involvement

.5  Address Impediments

.6  Definition of Done

 
.1   Final Burndown or Burnup Chart

.2   Velocity Achieved

3.5.1.4    Close Iteration (Sprint Review)

Close Iteration (Sprint Review) is the process of reviewing work completed in the current iteration, reviewing progress against the overall plan, reflecting on how the iteration went, and deciding how to improve in the next iteration.














Inputs



Tools & Techniques



Outputs


.1   Final Burndown or Burnup Chart

.2   Velocity Achieved

.3   Working Software for Completed User Stories

.4   Feedback from Team

 
.1  Sprint Review Meeting

.2  Sprint Retrospective Meeting

 
.1   Demo of Completed User Stories

.2   Updated Product Backlog

.3   Retrospective Actions

.4   Updated Velocity Graph

.5   Sprint Report

 

These processes are repeated for each iteration until the project’s objectives are achieved, or until it is decided that the objectives are no longer worth pursuing.

---

If you think I've missed anything important, have got anything in the wrong place, or just want to make comments, please do and I will refine this idea further and publish an update with your input.

Kelly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

9 + twenty =


There are 101 ways to do anything.
To find the best way, sometimes you need expert help

What People Say

“Kelly is an extremely talented and visionary leader. As such he manages to inspire all around him to achieve their best. He is passionate about agile and has a wealth of experience to bring to bear in this area. If you're 'lucky' he might even tell you all about his agile blog. Above all this, Kelly is great fun to work with. He is always relaxed and never gets stressed - and trust me, he had plenty of opportunity here! If you get the chance to work with Kelly, don't pass it up.”

GILES BENTLEY, DEVELOPMENT & OPERATIONS DIRECTOR
TIME INC

“I worked with Kelly on many projects at IPC and I was always impressed with his approach to all of them, always ensuring the most commercially viable route was taken. He is great at managing relationships and it was always a pleasure working with him.”

BEATRIZ MONTOYA/CONSUMER MARKETING DIRECTOR
IPC MEDIA

“Kelly was engaged as a Program Director on a complex business and technology transformation program for Suncorp Commercial Insurance. Kelly drew on his key capabilities and depth of experience to bring together disparate parties in a harmonised way, ensuring the initiate and concept phases of the program were understood and well formulated. Excellent outcome in a very short time frame. ”

BRUCE WEIR/EGM
SUNCORP

“Kelly came to the department and has really made a huge impact on how the department communicates, collaborates and generally gets things done. We were already developing in an agile way, but Kelly has brought us even more into alignment with agile and scrum best practices, being eager to share information and willing to work with us to change our processes rather than dictate how things must be done. He is highly knowledgable about agile development (as his active blog proves) but his blog won't show what a friendly and knowledgeable guy he is. I highly recommend Kelly to anyone looking for a CTO or a seminar on agile/scrum practices - you won't be disappointed!”

ANDY JEFFRIES/TECHNICAL LEAD
IPC MEDIA

“Kelly revolutionised the way our digital department operated. A true advocate of agile principles, he quickly improved internal communication within our teams and our internal clients by aligning our business and creating a much enhanced sense of transparency in the decisions the business was making. Kelly also introduced a higher sense of empowerment to the development teams...”

PETER SILVA-JANKOWSKI
IPC MEDIA

“Kelly and I worked together on a very large project trying to secure a new Insurer client. Kelly had fantastic commercial awareness as well as his technical expertise. Without him I would never had secured this client so I owe a lot to him. He is also a really great guy!”

GINA MILLARD
GLASS'S INFORMATION SERVICES

“Kelly’s a leading program director with the ability to take charge from day one and keep strong momentum at both a program and project level driving prioritisation, resourcing and budgeting agendas. Kelly operates with an easy-going style and possesses a strong facilitation skill set. From my 5 months experience working with Kelly, I would recommend Kelly to program manage large scale, complex, cross company change programs both from a business and IT perspective.”

LUKE SHARKEY /STRATEGY & IMPLEMENTATION LEADER
SUNCORP

“I worked with Kelly whilst at Thoughtworks and found him to be a most inspiring individual, his common-sense approach coupled with a deep understanding of Agile and business makes him an invaluable asset to any organisation. I can't recommend Kelly enough.”

PETER THATCHER, SENIOR ACCOUNT DIRECTOR
ThoughtWorks

“Kelly was a brilliant CTO and a great support to me in the time we worked together. I owe Kelly a great deal in terms of direction and how to get things done under sometimes difficult circumstances. Thanks Kelly.”

JULIE PEEL
GLASS'S INFORMATION SERVICES

“Kelly was a great colleague to work with - highly competent, trustworthy and generally a nice bloke.”

HANNAH JOYCE
GLASS'S INFORMATION SERVICES

“Kelly is an Agile heavy-weight. He came in to assess my multi-million $ Agile development program which wasn’t delivering the right throughput. He interviewed most of the team and made some key recommendations that, when implemented, showed immediate results. I couldn’t ask for more than that except he’s a really nice guy as well.”

DAN PULHAM, DIGITAL DIRECTOR
TELSTRA

CONTACT US

To explore how we can help you, please get in touch