Shortening the Tail

This content is syndicated from Jim Highsmith by Jim Highsmith. To view the original post in full, click here.

In Agile Project Management, I wrote a short section on a performance metric called “shortening the tail.” I liked using the metric, tail length, because it is easy to calculate and tells a lot about an organization’s Agile implementation. It’s not a vanity metric, like the number of developers who have attended a refactoring seminar, but a true learning metric because it focuses on a key tenant of Agile development—running, tested software. It’s also a metric that can help an organization move closer to Continuous Delivery...

The tail is the time period from “code slush” (true code freezes are rare) or “feature freeze” to actual deployment. This is the time period when companies do some or all of the following: beta testing, regression testing, product integration, integration testing, documentation, defect fixing. The worst “tail” I’ve encountered was 18 months—18 months from feature freeze to product release, and most of that time was spent in QA. Routinely I find software companies whose tail is 4–6 months of a 12-month release cycle. Then, there are other companies, and a growing number of software companies, that have honed their processes to a zero tail length—they are truly doing Continuous Delivery and Continuous Deployment. Using the tail length metric, particularly in products or applications that have large legacy code bases , can help organizations monitor their progress towards CD.

I worked with an organization several years ago that had a 6 month tail in a 12 month release cycle—and the tail was getting progressively worse with every release. The tail had gone from 4 to 6 months over the past 3 release cycles. The company set a goal to achieve a 1 month tail and worked diligently to achieve that goal over time.

Shortening the tail is a simple, powerful metric for measuring progress towards agility. The goal of agile teams is to produce shippable software every iteration, but most are far from this goal—especially if they have large, old legacy code bases. Think of everything a company might have to do to reduce a tail from six to three months to one month to a day. They would have to learn how to do continuous integration across their entire product. They would have to improve their level of automated testing to drive regression and integration testing back into every iteration. They would have to improve the level of automated unit testing done by developers to reduce testing time at the end of iterations and releases. They would have to bring customers into the development process much earlier, not waiting until the end for beta testing. They would have to integrate documentation specialists into the team and produce documentation continuously during iterations. They would have to invest in systematic refactoring to reduce the technical debt and therefore reduce testing and defect fixing time.

You can probably think of more they would have to do. Each of these items would contribute in some way, large or small, to reducing the tail by days or weeks. For large products the tail might never be zero, but it could be small. Just think of the competitive disadvantage a company has when their delivery tail is 18 months, or even 6 months. That means that for 6 or 18 months prior to release no changes in the competitive environment could be incorporated into their products. If Continuous Delivery seems too big a step, start on that path by first reducing the tail length on your product releases, before long Continuous Delivery won’t seem that big a stretch.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 + eight =

There are 101 ways to do anything.
To find the best way, sometimes you need expert help

What People Say

“Kelly was engaged as a Program Director on a complex business and technology transformation program for Suncorp Commercial Insurance. Kelly drew on his key capabilities and depth of experience to bring together disparate parties in a harmonised way, ensuring the initiate and concept phases of the program were understood and well formulated. Excellent outcome in a very short time frame. ”


“Kelly and I worked together on a very large project trying to secure a new Insurer client. Kelly had fantastic commercial awareness as well as his technical expertise. Without him I would never had secured this client so I owe a lot to him. He is also a really great guy!”


“I worked with Kelly whilst at Thoughtworks and found him to be a most inspiring individual, his common-sense approach coupled with a deep understanding of Agile and business makes him an invaluable asset to any organisation. I can't recommend Kelly enough.”


“Kelly is an Agile heavy-weight. He came in to assess my multi-million $ Agile development program which wasn’t delivering the right throughput. He interviewed most of the team and made some key recommendations that, when implemented, showed immediate results. I couldn’t ask for more than that except he’s a really nice guy as well.”


“Kelly revolutionised the way our digital department operated. A true advocate of agile principles, he quickly improved internal communication within our teams and our internal clients by aligning our business and creating a much enhanced sense of transparency in the decisions the business was making. Kelly also introduced a higher sense of empowerment to the development teams...”


“Kelly’s a leading program director with the ability to take charge from day one and keep strong momentum at both a program and project level driving prioritisation, resourcing and budgeting agendas. Kelly operates with an easy-going style and possesses a strong facilitation skill set. From my 5 months experience working with Kelly, I would recommend Kelly to program manage large scale, complex, cross company change programs both from a business and IT perspective.”


“I worked with Kelly on many projects at IPC and I was always impressed with his approach to all of them, always ensuring the most commercially viable route was taken. He is great at managing relationships and it was always a pleasure working with him.”


“Kelly was a great colleague to work with - highly competent, trustworthy and generally a nice bloke.”


“Kelly was a brilliant CTO and a great support to me in the time we worked together. I owe Kelly a great deal in terms of direction and how to get things done under sometimes difficult circumstances. Thanks Kelly.”


“Kelly came to the department and has really made a huge impact on how the department communicates, collaborates and generally gets things done. We were already developing in an agile way, but Kelly has brought us even more into alignment with agile and scrum best practices, being eager to share information and willing to work with us to change our processes rather than dictate how things must be done. He is highly knowledgable about agile development (as his active blog proves) but his blog won't show what a friendly and knowledgeable guy he is. I highly recommend Kelly to anyone looking for a CTO or a seminar on agile/scrum practices - you won't be disappointed!”


“Kelly is an extremely talented and visionary leader. As such he manages to inspire all around him to achieve their best. He is passionate about agile and has a wealth of experience to bring to bear in this area. If you're 'lucky' he might even tell you all about his agile blog. Above all this, Kelly is great fun to work with. He is always relaxed and never gets stressed - and trust me, he had plenty of opportunity here! If you get the chance to work with Kelly, don't pass it up.”



To explore how we can help you, please get in touch